PGM Hulk 1

Mr. Zipper · **Joined:** Apr 25, 2007 2:21 AM **Posts:** 6017

Bought many years ago as a VG. :stircrazy:

That said, it IS comparable to some of the lower end VGs in the first Overstreet Grading Guide. My, how times have changed.

Defects are obvious. Pluses: nice white pages, clean staples, tight cover and centerfold.

snitzer · **Posted:** Oct 23, 2008 5:45 PM

Went w/ a 2.5 here. Seems like a really decent low grade copy! No major rips, tears or chunks out. Just a bunch of old lady creases 'n wrinkles.

Ronny · **Joined:** Apr 16, 2009 1:51 AM **Posts:** 59

Looks like a 3.0 to me.

Anyway, that's a neat book. Congrats on having such a desirable book in your collection. :applause:

The Resurrection · **Joined:** Apr 12, 2009 4:17 PM **Posts:** 16

3.5. No big pieces missing, everythings tight. It could very well be a 3.0, but it would be a high 3.0. I wouldnt call this a complete beater.

Mr. Zipper · **Joined:** Apr 25, 2007 2:21 AM **Posts:** 6017

The Resurrection wrote:

3.5. No big pieces missing, everythings tight. It could very well be a 3.0, but it would be a high 3.0. I wouldnt call this a complete beater.

It'll have to do. I could never afford an upgrade now!! :winkgrin:

Steve Carey · **Posted:** Apr 18, 2009 12:41 AM

2.5 (not that there's anything wrong with that).

Gator · **Posted:** Apr 19, 2009 7:23 PM

maybe a 3.0

oakman29 · **Joined:** Mar 17, 2009 4:42 PM **Posts:** 167

3.0 beauty :greatbook:

Mike Greenwood · **Posted:** Apr 24, 2009 5:19 PM

Mr. Zipper wrote:

The Resurrection wrote:

3.5. No big pieces missing, everythings tight. It could very well be a 3.0, but it would be a high 3.0. I wouldnt call this a complete beater.

It'll have to do. I could never afford an upgrade now!! :winkgrin:

You could if you sold me some of your Actions!

I don't see any defect that would bring it below a 3.0 However, because the book has so many defects, it's possible it could be a 2.5

Mr. Zipper · **Joined:** Apr 25, 2007 2:21 AM **Posts:** 6017

Mike Greenwood wrote:

Mr. Zipper wrote:

The Resurrection wrote:

3.5. No big pieces missing, everythings tight. It could very well be a 3.0, but it would be a high 3.0. I wouldnt call this a complete beater.

It'll have to do. I could never afford an upgrade now!! :winkgrin:

You could if you sold me some of your Actions!

I don't see any defect that would bring it below a 3.0 However, because the book has so many defects, it's possible it could be a 2.5

I had it as a 2.5. But it is encouraging that so many think it may be a 3.0. :biggrin:

ComicCollectors · **Posted:** Apr 25, 2009 2:33 PM

Mr. Zipper wrote:

I had it as a 2.5. But it is encouraging that so many think it may be a 3.0. :biggrin:

You are correct, it is a GD+.

Monkeyman · **Joined:** Apr 25, 2007 2:21 AM **Posts:** 3512

I used the 2nd edition of the grading guide and it seems to fit in the 2.5 space.

Mike

oakman29 · **Joined:** Mar 17, 2009 4:42 PM **Posts:** 167

Marnin Rosenberg wrote:

Mr. Zipper wrote:

I had it as a 2.5. But it is encouraging that so many think it may be a 3.0. :biggrin:

You are correct, it is a GD+.

It's a 1.0 if you want to sell it to me :yipeeeee:

Mike Greenwood · **Posted:** Jul 30, 2009 6:27 AM

I'll give it a 3.0

Cimm · **Joined:** Mar 30, 2009 11:41 AM **Posts:** 1991

Mike Greenwood wrote:

Mr. Zipper wrote:

The Resurrection wrote:

3.5. No big pieces missing, everythings tight. It could very well be a 3.0, but it would be a high 3.0. I wouldnt call this a complete beater.

It'll have to do. I could never afford an upgrade now!! :winkgrin:

You could if you sold me some of your Actions!

I don't see any defect that would bring it below a 3.0 However, because the book has so many defects, it's possible it could be a 2.5

This is exactly what I was going to say. I voted 3.0 in the poll, but I can see it getting a 2.5 from the sheer number of detractors.

Publications

Informative

Historical

PGM Hulk 1

Who is online